This is something that I would often hear from my line manager, however I am guilty of not switching off my PC entirely. Sometimes I forget and sometimes I have something still running in the background, and I would let it continue running till the next day - like yesterday. But on the real side, it is amazing to see how much energy our IT&C networks and appliances consume. Not too long ago it was television that consumed large amounts of energy per household, no matter if it were switched on or not. But thankfully to the International Energy Agency (IEA) that spearheaded the "1-watt initiative", it reduced energy consumption by appliances, considerably.
Now think about this, that those were appliances that we could switch on and off, and hold in standby and it would be 'inactive' - but still consume loads of energy. Then think about "appliances" or technologies that are not even in your surroundings but you are probably using it right now to read this entry... OK, have you guessed what it is yet?
I hope you don't shoot yourself for this - but have you thought about the consumption of office server networks? What about the Internet that you use at home? The source of that connection has to come from some physical IT&C infrastructure. World wide, it is estimated that IT&C consumes 5% of global energy consumption - so high, as it is required to remain on standby so that it will be ready and fired up for you to use it the next time you click on the little Chrome/IE/Fire Fox/Opera icon, or sending an email. Now, people are just using their PCs, what about smarter technologies that have IT&C capabilities standard? Fridge, televisions - like the Samsung Series 7 (Awesome TV!!!), home audio? All these technologies will be linked to some server at some time of its use - and that server unfortunately has to be online for its use.
Now, to refresh your memory a bit, the IEA released a one pager document entitled "
Guiding Principles for Energy Efficiency in Networked Products" in 2007. Very basic principles and should be easy to apply - unless the manufacturer of that networked product has some other mandate. However, progress is being made by other countries and unions that are implementing policies that concentrate on the energy efficiency within networked products. Such as USA (Energy Star), Republic of Korea (e-Standby Programme and Energy Efficient Labelling Programme), and the European Union (Code of Conduct on Energy Efficiency of Broadband Equipment). But, as you know, drivers should not only come from national or international responsible authorities, energy efficiency should also be driven by the corporates that house these servers.
Considering a Report by
The New York Times: "Power, Pollution and the Internet" that looked at large corporates such as Google and Facebook. Here, they have incorporated and re-engineered their cooling systems and supported their energy and electricity consumption with the use of renewable energy, and also redesigned their hardware to improve energy efficiency. Within the corporate environment, it becomes a economic and monetary issue, where I would expect that they would aim to answer questions like: Are our operations feasible and viable considering the cost implications? Which activities can we implement that will reduce consumption and cost within the organisation? - Lets hope that companies are considering these questions and identifying the areas within their processes with the highest consumption... Lets hope.
Please read follow
this link for more information on other initiatives